Poet Laureate Simic

ba2001-01-10pic.jpgRamming Charles Simic up to his new title—Poet Laureate—makes me smirk. Poets like Alfred Lord Tennyson, William Wordsworth, and even Colley Cibber seem perfectly fine for honorifics and poems composed on state occasions, but Charles Simic falls the other way. Reading his poetry elicits feelings of familiarity, though not always comfort, and his work makes me want to call him “Chas,” “Charlie,” “Chuck,” or “Chuckie.”

He might hate my nicknames—I wouldn’t blame him, for who wants to be “Chuckie”?—but then again, maybe he wouldn’t mind. After all, he is the poet who wrote “Watermelons”:

Green Buddhas
On the fruit stand
We eat the smile
and spit out the teeth.

Simic occupies the shaded intersections of the odd Venn diagram bubbles of American poetry—he is an American surrealist and realist, a seriously humorous American poet, an absurd moralist, a comprehensive miniature artist. He often defies classification. Thus he may be the perfect choice for an American Poet Laureate, a Whitmanesque embodiment of singing everyone by singing only yourself.

My nicknaming him is no disrespect. Quite the contrary, comparing Simic to that other nicknamed former poet laureate Billy Collins, Simic seems just as witty and more varied in his style and subjects. I like Collins very much. He has a pleasant voice. But Simic has a surprising, sometimes disturbing one. Collins is perfect for offering in snippets, and I’ve been known to. Simic’s poems, however, are hard to subdivide. One of my favorites is “County Fair,” which I’ll offer in full:

If you didn’t see the six-legged dog,
It doesn’t matter.
We did, and he mostly lay in the corner.
As for the extra legs,

One got used to them quickly
And thought of other things.
Like, what a cold, dark night
To be out at the fair.

Then the keeper threw a stick
And the dog went after it
On four legs, the other two flapping behind,
Which made one girl shriek with laughter.

She was drunk and so was the man
Who kept kissing her neck.
The dog got the stick and looked back at us.
And that was the whole show.

I’m not fooled by this subject and neither is Simic. A six-legged dog is safely unconventional, the most naked, pandering sort of novelty. What Simic does with that dog makes the poem, however. He deflates his balloon by the second line. “It doesn’t matter” whether you’ve seen the dog. You get used to him. You’ve seen things like him. What you haven’t seen are those “other things” you could have noted and didn’t: the night, the temperature, the gentle bond between dog and “keeper.”

The two extra legs, Simic says baldly and unromantically, are just “flapping around.” Having six legs isn’t half as notable as the drunk girl laughing at the dog or the boyfriend who chooses this moment to kiss her neck. They surpass the dog, unaccountably attaining a freakishness the dog’s retrieving a stick lacks. By the end of the poem, when the dog looks at us, we feel more for the dog—with him—than for or with the laughing drunk girl. And, if that was “the whole show,” it was worth it.

Collins’ droll observations are wonderful and clever, eminently quotable, but more direct than what you usually find in Simic. In “County Fair,” Simic doesn’t need to tell us how to feel or hide in cleverly turned phrasing. He makes his meaning happen. I love that dog. I don’t quite know why except that Simic made me.

Though I won’t try your patience, I could easily cut and paste four or five other wonderful Simic poems. Find: “Toy Factory,” “Breasts,”* “The Big War,” and “Crazy About Her Shrimp.” You’ll enjoy getting to know him.

I am happy whoever chooses the American Poet Laureate chose Charlie Simic. I would even semi-publicly congratulate him except that I hold with April Bernard, one of my poetry teachers and a fine poet, who used to point out that many efforts to publicize poetry end up setting it apart and making it “special” only in the not-so-good sense of the word. “Poet Laureate” may be a role too big for anyone to wear, an impossibility akin to “Surgeon General” or “U. S. Postmaster.” But if Simic must be our six-legged dog, I hope he’ll be a six-legged dog we’ll love.

OK…one more Simic, appropriately titled “Charles Simic”:

Charles Simic is a sentence.
A sentence has a beginning and an end.

Is he a simple or compound sentence?
It depends on the weather,
It depends on the stars above.

What is the subject of the sentence?
The subject is your beloved Charles Simic.

How many verbs are there in the sentence?
Eating, sleeping, and fucking are some of its verbs.

What is the object of the sentence?
The object, my little ones,
Is not yet in sight.

And who is writing this awkward sentence?
A blackmailer, a girl in love,
And an applicant for a job.

Will they end with a period or a question mark?
They’ll end with an exclamation point and an ink spot.

*Warning: if you follow this link, you’ll find photos…so much for my G rating!

5 Responses

  1. I like your interpretation of “Country Fair”. Big Window posted another of Simic’s poems on her site. I asked her if she thought President Bush read Simic’s poetry.

    Who does choose the Poet Laureate? Is it an official title? I’d like to bestow Joe Felso with the title of Honorable Haiku Herald. What do you think?

    You know, I did some research on who chooses poet laureates, and I can’t really tell. The honor comes through the Library of Congress, so I have to assume they form some committee or something. Who knows who’s on it and how they decide. In the UK, the position has been controversial—historically, you’ve had to be pretty “safe” to get it over there. The same is somewhat true here—we’ve had some bland PLs—but in this case I’m happy. Look at Simic, he uses bad words. I’m so glad they saw past his superficial naughtiness and rewarded him for offering such a human voice. Not bad for someone who didn’t even start speaking English until his teens.

    Speaking of someone who struggled (is still struggling?) to master the English language, George Bush—I think—probably doesn’t read poetry, or, if he does, it is of the Guzzling-Log-Cabin-Syrup variety, not poetry like Simic’s. His administration has had a tough time dealing with poets. Sharon Olds turned down an invitation to the White House in 2005 and published an open letter to Laura Bush in The Nation explaining why the war in Iraq made it impossible for her to attend. It’s a beautiful letter. If you didn’t read it, here’s where you can find it:

    http://www.thenation.com/doc/20051010/olds

    If you Google “Poet Laureate,” you will find that some person does sponsor a “Poet Laureate of the Blogosphere.” Alas, no Haiku Herald. That’s OK, with school starting and all, I’m much too busy for all the ceremonial responsibilities such an honor would surely entail. Think of all the shopping malls where I would have to make appearances! Thanks for thinking of me though. Perhaps when I retire in 20 years… —D

  2. Ah, a new category: six-legged dog. I might have to do a writing topic on that!

    I have to agree, he does seem awfully down-to-earth for such an up-on-a-pedestal post. That is, I think, goodness.

    While you are writing for that category, maybe you should try to include some Mountain Dew in the post, as I also created a category for THAT and, thus far, no one has seen fit to post in it. And here I am, trying to lead the way…damn.

    Having Charlie Simic become US Poet Laureate has sort of made my month, actually. Just when I began to fear American Art—especially the official government sanctioned definition of art—had landed in a thousand-mile wide safety zone from which it would never escape, they up and do this. I’d hardly say all is well in U. S. Bush Inc., but we’re not entirely lost yet. —D

  3. Thank you for bringing that Sharon Olds letter to Laura Bush about Iraq to my attention. What a courageous, moral, poetic expression of justice and freedom! That letter inspires writers to tackle the world out there, way out there, as in bears on the intimate world in here. I have been trying to get up the courage to write about Iraq, something that feels like my moral duty as a writer and a mental health professional and just something for my own sanity and conscience as well. That letter may have given me the courage. I love your comments on our comments. They are as profound as your posts.

    I’ve used that letter (with Olds’ “May 1968″) as part of unit on American Poetry and American Politics in a team-taught interdisciplinary American Civilization class—along with “Paul Revere’s Ride” and “Star-Spangled Banner,” Melville’s Civil War poetry, some poetry from African Americans returning from World War I, Randall Jarrell’s “Death of the Ball Turret Gunner,” some stuff on Ezra Pound’s trial for sedition during WWII, and Galway Kinnell’s “Vapor Trail Reflected in the Frog Pond.” The idea is to explore the purposes we put poetry (and poets) to, how the role of artist and activist cross and sometimes conflict, and—that endless question—what does all that say about us as a culture. You won’t be surprised to hear, perhaps, that some like Longfellow and are skeptical of Olds and some vice versa.

    I’ve felt the same way you do about the War in Iraq but have always talked myself out of writing because I think, “What do I have to say? What special perspective could I offer?” I’d have to do a lot of reading before I felt ready to write, but maybe that’s part of the problem. Too many people feel they shouldn’t speak because they don’t know enough. Sometimes it’s about feeling enough instead. I love what you’ve written on your blog about the families of veterans—it makes real what—to too many American—is distant and abstract.

    And thank you for your comment on my comments on your comments. Dialogue is one of the best aspects of blogging—I doubt published writers get responses that are so immediate or interactive…another reason for me not to be jealous of them! —D

  4. Charles Simic made you love the six-legged dog; you made me love Charles Simic.

    I don’t really know who the other poet laureates are but I’m happy that he was chosen for the roster. His words are simple but well thought-out. They could easily be dismissed as being too shallow but they’re not. I liked how you elaborated “County Fair”. The poem emotionally hit me and your interpretation deepened those feelings.

    I really love reading your blog. I always learn something new. It opens up a world of literature and writing that I never knew about. It’s like a starting-off point for further learnings on my own. Thank you so much, D.

    You’re welcome, anytime, pish-posh, my pleasure, it’s nothing, don’t mention it, a triffle. What did I leave out? I feel the same way about your blogs, which make me laugh and often send me careening off in entirely new directions. It’s just a regular ole’ orgy of a lovefest here in the blogosphere. There ’s alot of crap online, but I’m so happy to find so many new and interesting friends…like you! —D

  5. That comment about guzzling-syrup poetry made me laugh out loud. I’m thinking of designing a poetry meme, like the Thinking Blogger. Just you wait and see.

    As far as speaking out on the war goes, if not you, than who? You’re one of the smartest writers I know. Just coming from YOU is a unique enough perspective.

    You know, I might pay some money to listen in on one of George Bush’s conversations with God. I don’t really understand him. Churchill once said Russia was “a riddle wrapped in mystery inside an enigma.” Bush is a riddle wrapped in mystery inside an enigma of a moron. I think he takes Log Cabin intravenously. He lives in a world of his own, as far as I can tell.

    Oops. So much for keeping my politics to myself…and staying off the FBI radar.

    Thanks for believing I have something to say…I don’t always feel that way. You’ve been so encouraging. —D

Leave a Reply